Divisive, Negative, and Populist?! An Empirical Analysis of European Populist and Mainstream Parties’ Use of Digital Political Advertisements

Authors

  • Simon Kruschinski Department of Communication, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany
  • Márton Bene Centre for Social Sciences – MTA Centre of Excellence; Eötvös Loránd University
  • Jörg Haßler Department of Communication, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich
  • Uta Rußmann Department of Media, Society, and Communication, University of Innsbruck
  • Darren Lilleker Department of Media and Communication, Bournemouth University
  • Delia Cristina Balaban Department of Communication, Public Relations and Advertising, Babeş-Bolyai University
  • Paweł Baranowski Department of Communication, University of Wrocław
  • Andrea Ceron Department of Social and Political Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano
  • Vicente Fenoll Department of the Theory of Languages and Communication Sciences, University of Valencia
  • Daniel Jackson Department of Media and Communication, Bournemouth University

Keywords:

dissonant public sphere, digital advertising, Facebook, populism, negativity

Abstract

For digital political advertising (DPA) on Facebook, parties can complement their organic communication by targeting users with sponsored posts (Facebook-sponsored posts) and advertising campaigns (Facebook ads). Based on the theoretical framework of dissonant public spheres in the digital age, this article provides the first empirical analysis of how and with what content populist and mainstream parties use DPA on Facebook for divisive, negative, and populist messages. We analyze a data set of approximately 10,000 Facebook organic posts, sponsored posts, and ads published by 53 parties across 10 European countries during the 2019 European parliamentary election. Our findings reveal that populist and mainstream parties do not sponsor more posts or spend more money on ads containing divisive topics, negativity, and populist communication styles. Our article extends the debate on digital public spheres by incorporating parties’ use of division, negativity, and populism in DPA, thus offering a better understanding of their implications for shaping dissonant public spheres.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-26

Issue

Section

Articles