Talking About the Voice: Everyday Political Talk About Indigenous Constitutional Recognition

Authors

  • Kate Nash University of Newcastle, Australia
  • Caitlin Mollica University of Newcastle, Australia
  • Kate Senior University of Newcastle, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65476/qe19mk95

Keywords:

affect, political talk, settler-colonization, referendum

Abstract

In 2023, Australians went to the polls to vote on a proposal to recognize Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the national constitution through the creation of an advisory body called the Voice. The proposal was soundly defeated, raising questions about the possibility of reconciliation and Indigenous recognition. While there have been many attempts to explain the outcome, this article takes an interpersonal perspective focusing on voters’ experiences of talking about the Voice. Our aim is to contribute to studies of everyday political talk in contexts of political disagreement, considering the affective dynamics of settler colonialism. We suggest that the ability to talk constructively about the ongoing impacts of colonization and Indigenous recognition, both of which are fundamental to the broader project of reconciliation and truth telling, will require attention to questions of everyday listening in the context of settler-Indigenous relationships.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-05

Issue

Section

Articles