Home Contact Us Advanced Search Journal Help
IJoC
EDITORIAL BOARD
FOUNDING EDITORS
Editor
Larry Gross
International Journal of Communication|USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism
Managing Editor
Arlene Luck
Managing Editor, USC Annenberg Press, University of Southern California
Book Review Editors
Gustavo Cardoso
University of Lisbon
Josh Kun
USC Annenberg School
Jack Linchuan Qiu
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Editorial Board
Sean Aday
George Washington University
Jonathan David Aronson
USC Annenberg School
Sandra Ball-Rokeach
USC Annenberg School
Svetlana Balmaeva
Liberal Arts University
Sarah Banet-Weiser
USC Annenberg School
Howard S. Becker
San Francisco
Yochai Benkler
Harvard Law School
Lance Bennett
University of Washington
Bruce Bimber
UC Santa Barbara
Pablo Javier Boczkowski
Northwestern University
Jennings Bryant
University of Alabama
danah boyd
Microsoft Research
Manuel Castells
USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism
Michael X. Delli Carpini
University of Pennsylvania
Susan Douglas
University of Michigan
John D.H. Downing
Southern Illinois University
Stephen Duncombe
New York University
William Dutton
Oxford University
Richard Dyer
University of London
John Nguyet Erni
Lingnan University
Oscar Gandy
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Dilip Gaonkar
Northwestern University
Ian Glenn
University of Cape Town
Trudy Govier
University of Lethbridge
Sergio Godoy
Universidad Catolica de Chile
Mary L. Gray
Microsoft Research & Indiana University
Larry Grossberg
University of North Carolina
Manuel Alejandro Guerrero
Universidad Iberoamericana
James Hamilton
Duke University
Eszter Hargittai
Northwestern University
John Hartley
Curtin University
Kathleen Hall Jamieson
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Henry Jenkins
USC Annenberg School
Steve Jones
University of Illinois-Chicago
Elihu Katz
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Douglas Kellner
UCLA
Marwan M. Kraidy
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Justin Lewis
Cardiff University
Sonia Livingstone
London School of Economics
Robin Elizabeth Mansell
London School of Economics
Robert McChesney
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Toby Miller
City University London
Peter R. Monge
USC Annenberg School
Thomas Nakayama
Northeastern University
Horace Newcomb
University of Georgia
Zhongdang Pan
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Zizi Papacharissi
University of Illinois at Chicago
John Durham Peters
University of Iowa
Alejandro Piscitelli
University of Buenos Aires
Dana Polan
NYU
Marshall Scott Poole
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Adam Powell
University of Southern California
Monroe Price
University of Pennsylvania
Janice Radway
Northwestern University
N. Bhaskara Rao
Centre for Media Studies, New Delhi
Michael Renov
USC Cinematic Arts
Eric Rothenbuhler
Webster University
Ellen Seiter
USC Cinematic Arts
Michael Schudson
Columbia University
Jonathan Sterne
McGill University
John Thompson
Cambridge University
Yariv Tsfati
University of Haifa
Ingrid Volkmer
University of Melbourne
Simon J. Wilkie
USC Economics
Barbie Zelizer
Annenberg/ University of Pennsylvania
Yuezhi Zhao
Simon Fraser University

University of Southern California

International Journal of Communication, Vol 6 (2012)

Info Capacity| How to Measure the World’s Technological Capacity to Communicate, Store and Compute Information? Part I: Results and Scope

Martin Hilbert, Priscila López

Abstract


This is Part I of a two-part article that reviews methodological and statistical challenges involved in the estimation of humanity’s technological capacity to communicate, store, and compute information. It is written from the perspective of the results of our recent inventory of 60 technological categories between 1986 and 2007 (measured in bits and MIPS [million-instructions-per-second]). In Part I, we summarize the results of our inventory, and explore a series of basic choices that must be made in the course of measuring information and communication capacities. The most basic underlying assumptions behind our estimates include—among others—decisions about what is counted as (1) communication, (2) storage, and (3) computation; if technological capacities or consumption of information is measured; and if unique information is distinguished from duplicate information. We compare our methodological choices with different approaches taken in similar studies. The article shows how the particular question on the researcher’s mind, as well as the availability of source data has and will influence most of the methodological choices in different exercises.

Full Text: PDF Copyright Notice Privacy Policy University of Southern California USC Annenberg Center